2083 A European Declaration of Independence

August 2, 2011

2.16 Why the discipline of Sociology must be completely removed from Academia

Filed under: Uncategorized — sitamnesty @ 10:30

Marx is considered to be the greatest contributor to the science of sociology primarily due to his analysis of capitalist societies and the various alleged injustices and economic failures that they produce, and suggested socialist remedies. The discipline of sociology appeals to Marxists and bleeding heart liberals who would rather blame others for their problems than take personal ownership of these problems.

The sociology discipline is described as the revolutionary “tools for change” by Marxist intellectuals as it contributes to institutionalise cultural Marxism/multiculturalism. Modern sociology provides an examination of the pivotal theories of Marx, Durkheim, Weber and Comte, the authors that have decisively shaped the discipline.

Students of sociology are taught how the public apparatus may be used (by deliberately manipulating statistics, and rejecting all aspects of biology) to portray and propagate a Marxist world view. Any and all faculties of sociology in the European world (US/Europe) are therefore in many ways Marxist indoctrination camps where the students learn how to infiltrate public institutions and covertly contribute to change the character of society by presenting falsified reports and statistics.

Sociology is fundamentally anti capitalist and anti traditionalist (anti-nationalist, -patriarchal, – Christendom) and as such; anti-European by design. Furthermore, a large percentage (90%+) of sociologists refuse to acknowledge biology as relevant and instead proclaim that environment is the cause of all human behaviour.

In order to defeat one of the most devastating academic weapons of the cultural Marxists/multiculturalists, we must destroy/ban the discipline of sociology completely.

Sociology students are indoctrinated by learning (from a Marxist point of view) what is wrong in the world. As such, they are transformed into academic Marxist revolutionaries.

So why did the conservative post-WW2 European elites allow the discipline of sociology to exist and its propagators to operate freely at our universities?

The European elites at the time, underestimated the discipline as it could not directly affect the “important aspects/sectors” of society (according to their definition); defence (police/military), law and finance. Needless to say, this was a critical mistake because the discipline of Marxist sociology would later prove to significantly contribute to shape the cultural/social structures of our societies which lead to the 68 cultural Marxist revolts in the European world.

Apologists of sociology have successfully prevented the removal of the discipline using the following arguments:

Sociology aims to explain what is, not what could be. The students learn about everything that is wrong in the world (from a Marxist narrative) but NOT “specifically” how to change it. However, as we all know the students indirectly learn how to change our societies as they study other aspects of Marxism.

Imagine the following; the sociology students learned about what is wrong in the world from a Nazi narrative, that the Jew is the root of all evil. Wouldn’t that have lead them to draw their own conclusions based on the self study of Nazi intellectual works (that the Jew had to be killed)? Of course it would. Regardless of which ideological narrative is chosen, the student will be brainwashed in that particular ideological direction.

The Marxist (cultural Marxist) revolutionary disciplines (disciplines of the Frankfurt school) are not limited to sociology, however; philosophy and journalism are highly affected by the same level of Marxist indoctrination. Their academic weapons are to deliberate spread their falsified and corrupted Marxist world view through statistics, reports and articles with the aim to glorify the Marxist/multiculturalist world view and to effectively undermine nationalistic/conservative/capitalist thought. These individuals must not be underestimated as they are usually very influential in society (which is the reason why 95% of them are categorised as category B traitors).

(Related professions: psychologists and social workers)

Political sociologists

Offices infiltrated by sociologists (or individuals who has a sociology major):

Public administrative positions (usually government and public agencies that administer human services).

Sectors heavily infiltrated with individuals who have taken a sociology degree/courses in sociology:

Census analyst
Community organizer
Consultant
Criminal justice planner
Demographer
Diversity related professions

Health and Family Planning

Interviewer
Jury Consultant

Labour relations
Law enforcement officer
Market researcher
Mediator
Military

Ministry
Non-profit Organizations (leaders)

NGOs (leaders)

Personnel Management

Planning Departments in various agencies

Politics

Population analyst
Public opinion pollster
Publishing – editing, research and sales

Prisons

Psychiatric social worker
Recreation worker
Researcher
Rural sociologist
School social worker
Social services volunteer coordinator
Social worker
Sociology professor
State and Local Agencies

Substance abuse counsellor
Teaching and counselling – high school, college, university

Training and development

Sociology bachelor’s degree as background for graduate school in:

Journalism
Law
Medicine
Divinity School
Education
Political Science
Economics
Business Administration

Apolitical sociologists

A small minority of sociologists are not considered traitors as they are apolitical.

An alternative instead of a complete removal of the discipline of sociology from academia

Instead of destroying the discipline of sociology by removing it, an alternative approach is to completely reform it; replacing the Marxist ideological view with a conservative/anti-Marxist by instead using ideological fundaments from the following works/authors;

The Bible

Machiavelli
George Orwell

Thomas Hobbes

John Stuart Mill

John Locke

Adam Smith

Edmund Burke

Ayn Rand

William James

Advertisements

Leave a Comment »

No comments yet.

RSS feed for comments on this post. TrackBack URI

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s

Blog at WordPress.com.

%d bloggers like this: